Question 1
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Question 1
by George1963 Wed Jun 17, 2015 12:59 pm
Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
I'll only read the first two or three letters of your response.
I'll only read the first two or three letters of your response.
George1963- 3rd Round Pick
- Posts : 1448
Join date : 2012-06-11
Age : 61
Location : Cheraw SC
Re: Question 1
by guppy Thu Jun 18, 2015 6:12 pm
George1963 wrote:Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
I'll only read the first two or three letters of your response.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
guppy- 1st Round Pick
- Posts : 2310
Join date : 2012-11-23
Location : Massachusetts
Re: Question 1
by George1963 Sat Jun 20, 2015 12:54 pm
guppy wrote:George1963 wrote:Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
I'll only read the first two or three letters of your response.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
So your answer is "htt"?
Can't even say yes or no. Long years of experience tells me something here.
George1963- 3rd Round Pick
- Posts : 1448
Join date : 2012-06-11
Age : 61
Location : Cheraw SC
Re: Question 1
by George1963 Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:11 pm
George1963 wrote:Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
It's a simple question.
George1963- 3rd Round Pick
- Posts : 1448
Join date : 2012-06-11
Age : 61
Location : Cheraw SC
Re: Question 1
by George1963 Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:13 pm
George1963 wrote:George1963 wrote:Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
It's a simple question.
George1963- 3rd Round Pick
- Posts : 1448
Join date : 2012-06-11
Age : 61
Location : Cheraw SC
Re: Question 1
by George1963 Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:13 pm
George1963 wrote:George1963 wrote:George1963 wrote:Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
It's a simple question.
George1963- 3rd Round Pick
- Posts : 1448
Join date : 2012-06-11
Age : 61
Location : Cheraw SC
Re: Question 1
by George1963 Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:13 pm
George1963 wrote:George1963 wrote:George1963 wrote:George1963 wrote:Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
It's a simple question.
George1963- 3rd Round Pick
- Posts : 1448
Join date : 2012-06-11
Age : 61
Location : Cheraw SC
Re: Question 1
by George1963 Fri Jun 26, 2015 4:38 pm
I'll do this every day. And every time I do it exposes you.
Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
It's a simple question.
Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
It's a simple question.
George1963- 3rd Round Pick
- Posts : 1448
Join date : 2012-06-11
Age : 61
Location : Cheraw SC
Re: Question 1
by guppy Fri Jun 26, 2015 8:53 pm
George1963 wrote:I'll do this every day. And every time I do it exposes you.
Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
It's a simple question.
A multi-million dollar investigation by a high powered New York law firm and its investigators failed to extract any kind of confession, admission, eye witness statement, or any direct evidence that they did?
No?
You're kidding?
Millions of dollars!
Repeated interviews!
100 days of investigation!
Video surveillance!
Forensics!
But no confessions?
No admissions?
No eyewitness?
No direct evidence?
Seriously?
You're joking, right?
Not THE famous Ted Wells collecting all those expensive legal fees?
And then coming up woefully short?
No?
How about Brady?
Nothing from Brady?
He interviewed Tom for a full day?
Anything?
Nothing?
Really?
In the end, being forced to lower himself to base his personal opinion and conclusions on a couple of text-happy stooges?
That's it?
That's the best ole Teddy boy could come up with?
His own opinion?
Relying totally on his opinion about a few off color texts?
None of which were sent to, or received from, Tom Brady?
How pathetically weak.
Can't be possible.
Can it?
Where is Jethro Gibbs when you need him?
Maybe Gibbs would have gotten a confession or an admission.
Or at least something.
From somebody.
Seriously, how hard could it be for a multi million dollar high powered investigation to make a couple of simpletons like Moe or Larry crack?
How hard?
LMAO.
guppy- 1st Round Pick
- Posts : 2310
Join date : 2012-11-23
Location : Massachusetts
Re: Question 1
by George1963 Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:21 pm
So, still no yes or no?guppy wrote:George1963 wrote:I'll do this every day. And every time I do it exposes you.
Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
It's a simple question.
A multi-million dollar investigation by a high powered New York law firm and its investigators failed to extract any kind of confession, admission, eye witness statement, or any direct evidence that they did?
No?
You're kidding?
Millions of dollars!
Repeated interviews!
100 days of investigation!
Video surveillance!
Forensics!
But no confessions?
No admissions?
No eyewitness?
No direct evidence?
Seriously?
You're joking, right?
Not THE famous Ted Wells collecting all those expensive legal fees?
And then coming up woefully short?
No?
How about Brady?
Nothing from Brady?
He interviewed Tom for a full day?
Anything?
Nothing?
Really?
In the end, being forced to lower himself to base his personal opinion and conclusions on a couple of text-happy stooges?
That's it?
That's the best ole Teddy boy could come up with?
His own opinion?
Relying totally on his opinion about a few off color texts?
None of which were sent to, or received from, Tom Brady?
How pathetically weak.
Can't be possible.
Can it?
Where is Jethro Gibbs when you need him?
Maybe Gibbs would have gotten a confession or an admission.
Or at least something.
From somebody.
Seriously, how hard could it be for a multi million dollar high powered investigation to make a couple of simpletons like Moe or Larry crack?
How hard?
LMAO.
George1963- 3rd Round Pick
- Posts : 1448
Join date : 2012-06-11
Age : 61
Location : Cheraw SC
Re: Question 1
by George1963 Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:25 pm
Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
It's a simple question that you'll never answer, because you know what the obvious follow up question is.
It's a simple question that you'll never answer, because you know what the obvious follow up question is.
George1963- 3rd Round Pick
- Posts : 1448
Join date : 2012-06-11
Age : 61
Location : Cheraw SC
Re: Question 1
by guppy Sat Jun 27, 2015 8:37 am
George1963 wrote:So, still no yes or no?guppy wrote:George1963 wrote:I'll do this every day. And every time I do it exposes you.
Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
It's a simple question.
A multi-million dollar investigation by a high powered New York law firm and its investigators failed to extract any kind of confession, admission, eye witness statement, or any direct evidence that they did?
No?
You're kidding?
Millions of dollars!
Repeated interviews!
100 days of investigation!
Video surveillance!
Forensics!
But no confessions?
No admissions?
No eyewitness?
No direct evidence?
Seriously?
You're joking, right?
Not THE famous Ted Wells collecting all those expensive legal fees?
And then coming up woefully short?
No?
How about Brady?
Nothing from Brady?
He interviewed Tom for a full day?
Anything?
Nothing?
Really?
In the end, being forced to lower himself to base his personal opinion and conclusions on a couple of text-happy stooges?
That's it?
That's the best ole Teddy boy could come up with?
His own opinion?
Relying totally on his opinion about a few off color texts?
None of which were sent to, or received from, Tom Brady?
How pathetically weak.
Can't be possible.
Can it?
Where is Jethro Gibbs when you need him?
Maybe Gibbs would have gotten a confession or an admission.
Or at least something.
From somebody.
Seriously, how hard could it be for a multi million dollar high powered investigation to make a couple of simpletons like Moe or Larry crack?
How hard?
LMAO.
What part of "there is no proof" that you don't get?
guppy- 1st Round Pick
- Posts : 2310
Join date : 2012-11-23
Location : Massachusetts
Re: Question 1
by Admin Sat Jun 27, 2015 2:25 pm
What part of - YOU haven't answered the question, don't you get?guppy wrote:George1963 wrote:So, still no yes or no?guppy wrote:George1963 wrote:I'll do this every day. And every time I do it exposes you.
Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
It's a simple question.
A multi-million dollar investigation by a high powered New York law firm and its investigators failed to extract any kind of confession, admission, eye witness statement, or any direct evidence that they did?
No?
You're kidding?
Millions of dollars!
Repeated interviews!
100 days of investigation!
Video surveillance!
Forensics!
But no confessions?
No admissions?
No eyewitness?
No direct evidence?
Seriously?
You're joking, right?
Not THE famous Ted Wells collecting all those expensive legal fees?
And then coming up woefully short?
No?
How about Brady?
Nothing from Brady?
He interviewed Tom for a full day?
Anything?
Nothing?
Really?
In the end, being forced to lower himself to base his personal opinion and conclusions on a couple of text-happy stooges?
That's it?
That's the best ole Teddy boy could come up with?
His own opinion?
Relying totally on his opinion about a few off color texts?
None of which were sent to, or received from, Tom Brady?
How pathetically weak.
Can't be possible.
Can it?
Where is Jethro Gibbs when you need him?
Maybe Gibbs would have gotten a confession or an admission.
Or at least something.
From somebody.
Seriously, how hard could it be for a multi million dollar high powered investigation to make a couple of simpletons like Moe or Larry crack?
How hard?
LMAO.
What part of "there is no proof" that you don't get?
Admin- Admin
- Posts : 1322
Join date : 2012-01-21
Location : Everywhere -
Re: Question 1
by guppy Sun Jun 28, 2015 10:56 am
Admin wrote:What part of - YOU haven't answered the question, don't you get?guppy wrote:George1963 wrote:So, still no yes or no?guppy wrote:George1963 wrote:I'll do this every day. And every time I do it exposes you.
Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
It's a simple question.
A multi-million dollar investigation by a high powered New York law firm and its investigators failed to extract any kind of confession, admission, eye witness statement, or any direct evidence that they did?
No?
You're kidding?
Millions of dollars!
Repeated interviews!
100 days of investigation!
Video surveillance!
Forensics!
But no confessions?
No admissions?
No eyewitness?
No direct evidence?
Seriously?
You're joking, right?
Not THE famous Ted Wells collecting all those expensive legal fees?
And then coming up woefully short?
No?
How about Brady?
Nothing from Brady?
He interviewed Tom for a full day?
Anything?
Nothing?
Really?
In the end, being forced to lower himself to base his personal opinion and conclusions on a couple of text-happy stooges?
That's it?
That's the best ole Teddy boy could come up with?
His own opinion?
Relying totally on his opinion about a few off color texts?
None of which were sent to, or received from, Tom Brady?
How pathetically weak.
Can't be possible.
Can it?
Where is Jethro Gibbs when you need him?
Maybe Gibbs would have gotten a confession or an admission.
Or at least something.
From somebody.
Seriously, how hard could it be for a multi million dollar high powered investigation to make a couple of simpletons like Moe or Larry crack?
How hard?
LMAO.
What part of "there is no proof" that you don't get?
If there is no proof, AND if the scientific evidence actually supports an opposite conclusion than the one Wells made the huge leap in order to reach, there can only be one possible answer.
It'll come to you.
guppy- 1st Round Pick
- Posts : 2310
Join date : 2012-11-23
Location : Massachusetts
Re: Question 1
by George1963 Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:53 pm
So, still no yes or no?
What part of "there is no proof" that you don't get?
What part of - YOU haven't answered the question, don't you get?
If there is no proof, AND if the scientific evidence actually supports an opposite conclusion than the one Wells made the huge leap in order to reach, there can only be one possible answer.
IT HAS BEEN PROVEN TO THE AGREED UPON STANDARD. I know you're a Patriots fan, so rules are only suggestions to you, but those are the rules. Just enough is enough. Just like it is for anybody with half a brain.
What part of "there is no proof" that you don't get?
What part of - YOU haven't answered the question, don't you get?
If there is no proof, AND if the scientific evidence actually supports an opposite conclusion than the one Wells made the huge leap in order to reach, there can only be one possible answer.
IT HAS BEEN PROVEN TO THE AGREED UPON STANDARD. I know you're a Patriots fan, so rules are only suggestions to you, but those are the rules. Just enough is enough. Just like it is for anybody with half a brain.
George1963- 3rd Round Pick
- Posts : 1448
Join date : 2012-06-11
Age : 61
Location : Cheraw SC
Re: Question 1
by George1963 Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:59 pm
And by the way, you STILL won't say if you think McNally and Jastremski messed with the balls.
"No proof" isn't an answer. Especially when there is.
"No proof" isn't an answer. Especially when there is.
George1963- 3rd Round Pick
- Posts : 1448
Join date : 2012-06-11
Age : 61
Location : Cheraw SC
Re: Question 1
by George1963 Mon Jun 29, 2015 5:01 pm
What part of "there is no proof" that you don't get?
There's less proof that Aaron Hernandez killed Odin Lloyd than that the Patriots balls were doctored.
There's less proof that Aaron Hernandez killed Odin Lloyd than that the Patriots balls were doctored.
George1963- 3rd Round Pick
- Posts : 1448
Join date : 2012-06-11
Age : 61
Location : Cheraw SC
Re: Question 1
by George1963 Mon Jun 29, 2015 5:07 pm
guppy wrote:George1963 wrote:I'll do this every day. And every time I do it exposes you.
Do you think Mo and/or Larry screwed with the balls?
It's a simple question.
A multi-million dollar investigation by a high powered New York law firm and its investigators failed to extract any kind of confession, admission, eye witness statement, or any direct evidence that they did?
Comm of Mass v Aaron Hernandez
No?
You're kidding?
Millions of dollars!
Repeated interviews!
100 days of investigation!
Video surveillance!
Forensics!
But no confessions?
Comm of Mass v Aaron Hernandez
No admissions?
No eyewitness?
No direct evidence?
Comm of Mass v Aaron Hernandez
Seriously?
You're joking, right?
Not THE famous Ted Wells collecting all those expensive legal fees?
And then coming up woefully short?
No?
How about Brady?
Nothing from Brady?
He interviewed Tom for a full day?
Anything?
Nothing?
Really?
In the end, being forced to lower himself to base his personal opinion and conclusions on a couple of text-happy stooges?
Comm of Mass v Aaron Hernandez
That's it?
That's the best ole Teddy boy could come up with?
His own opinion?
Relying totally on his opinion about a few off color texts?
None of which were sent to, or received from, Tom Brady?
How pathetically weak.
Can't be possible.
Can it?
Where is Jethro Gibbs when you need him?
Maybe Gibbs would have gotten a confession or an admission.
Or at least something.
From somebody.
Seriously, how hard could it be for a multi million dollar high powered investigation to make a couple of simpletons like Moe or Larry crack?
How hard?
Ask assistant District Attorney Patrick Bomberg
LMAO.
George1963- 3rd Round Pick
- Posts : 1448
Join date : 2012-06-11
Age : 61
Location : Cheraw SC
Re: Question 1
by guppy Fri Jul 03, 2015 3:29 pm
George1963 wrote:
There's less proof that Aaron Hernandez killed Odin Lloyd than that the Patriots balls were doctored.
Please stay away from all juries and all opportunities for jury duty.
PLEASE!
guppy- 1st Round Pick
- Posts : 2310
Join date : 2012-11-23
Location : Massachusetts
Similar topics» question for ya'll
» Serious Question
» Another INSIGHTFUL QUESTION
» The Big Question ?
» INSIGHTFUL QUESTION
» Serious Question
» Another INSIGHTFUL QUESTION
» The Big Question ?
» INSIGHTFUL QUESTION
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|