Desmond Bishop

by Guest Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:52 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Guest Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:28 pm

NJPackfan wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Unless they have injury concerns--that's a mistake, IMO... Bishop is about the only one on that side of the ball who brings any Mean Joe Greene to these fucking little tinker bells...AND he's a player. One year away best case from making this move...

by ffaralli Sat Apr 27, 2013 4:03 pm

Someone is blowing smoke up our collective asses, unless his injury is so bad that it affects his career.

Now Starks being traded is believable.

FF

by milani Sat Apr 27, 2013 4:35 pm

GM will announce that they are going to "shop" player for a variety of reasons and may have no intention of actually entertaining a trade. It can be to fake other teams out as a draft strategy or they may want to see what kind of value he now has with other potential teams coming off of injury.

I second this motion also. Would make no sense unless Bishop is very damaged goods. And then who would want him in that condition. The Bears? To fill Urlacher's shorts? Brad Jones and Francois are not in Bishop's league.

by RingoCStarrQB Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:03 pm

Yeah......makes no sense whatsoever. Bishop is a real NFL LB. Remember his pick off versus Favre and the Vikings?

by Sponsored content

Desmond Bishop

Desmond Bishop

Re: Desmond Bishop

Don't believe it

Re: Desmond Bishop

Re: Desmond Bishop

Re: Desmond Bishop