The Manchild Opens Mouth Yet Again

JnC4GB wrote:Packers TE: Brian Urlacher 'slow'

The Bears will be without star linebacker Brian Urlacher when they face Green Bay this weekend, and Packers tight end Jermichael Finley said that actually might be a good thing for Chicago.

"Urlacher is at the end of his career right now; he's playing a little slow out there," Finley told Fox Sports Wisconsin on Wednesday. "I don't think they're losing too much if he's out. Putting another guy in might help them a little."

MB20 wrote:

JnC4GB wrote:Packers TE: Brian Urlacher 'slow'

The Bears will be without star linebacker Brian Urlacher when they face Green Bay this weekend, and Packers tight end Jermichael Finley said that actually might be a good thing for Chicago.

"Urlacher is at the end of his career right now; he's playing a little slow out there," Finley told Fox Sports Wisconsin on Wednesday. "I don't think they're losing too much if he's out. Putting another guy in might help them a little."

He's not properly MANAGED

MB20 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Linebacker Brian Urlacher has responded to Packers tight end Jermichael Finley, who said that the Bears are better off with the long-time anchor of their defense.

“Just like a couple of years ago, I think, he tore his ACL and the Packers were actually better without him,” Urlacher told SiriusXM NFL Radio on Thursday, via the Chicago Sun-Times. “You know, they won the Super Bowl. I hope we can duplicate that as well because it won’t hurt my feelings if we go on and win the Super Bowl without me like they did without him.”

duck wrote:

MB20 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Linebacker Brian Urlacher has responded to Packers tight end Jermichael Finley, who said that the Bears are better off with the long-time anchor of their defense.

“Just like a couple of years ago, I think, he tore his ACL and the Packers were actually better without him,” Urlacher told SiriusXM NFL Radio on Thursday, via the Chicago Sun-Times. “You know, they won the Super Bowl. I hope we can duplicate that as well because it won’t hurt my feelings if we go on and win the Super Bowl without me like they did without him.”

Score one for Urlacher.

It's weird how testy this Sunday's game is getting. It's been a while since I've seen this much trash talking before a game. Each team is giving the other lots of bulletin board material.

_HD_ wrote:

duck wrote:

MB20 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Linebacker Brian Urlacher has responded to Packers tight end Jermichael Finley, who said that the Bears are better off with the long-time anchor of their defense.

“Just like a couple of years ago, I think, he tore his ACL and the Packers were actually better without him,” Urlacher told SiriusXM NFL Radio on Thursday, via the Chicago Sun-Times. “You know, they won the Super Bowl. I hope we can duplicate that as well because it won’t hurt my feelings if we go on and win the Super Bowl without me like they did without him.”

Score one for Urlacher.

It's weird how testy this Sunday's game is getting. It's been a while since I've seen this much trash talking before a game. Each team is giving the other lots of bulletin board material.

Yup. It's a big game for both teams--but particularly the Bears. They lose this one--and undoubtedly it will set into play a chain of events that set the organization in a new direction...

milani wrote: It got a lot like this in the Ditka-Gregg years when the Bears were clearly the superior team. A lot of respect from both sides remained until this fiasco started. This is the stuff that baits cheap shots, injuries, and silly penalties. Not what we need when we want to get to the post season and have to face the best.

duck wrote:

_HD_ wrote:

duck wrote:

MB20 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Linebacker Brian Urlacher has responded to Packers tight end Jermichael Finley, who said that the Bears are better off with the long-time anchor of their defense.

“Just like a couple of years ago, I think, he tore his ACL and the Packers were actually better without him,” Urlacher told SiriusXM NFL Radio on Thursday, via the Chicago Sun-Times. “You know, they won the Super Bowl. I hope we can duplicate that as well because it won’t hurt my feelings if we go on and win the Super Bowl without me like they did without him.”

Score one for Urlacher.

It's weird how testy this Sunday's game is getting. It's been a while since I've seen this much trash talking before a game. Each team is giving the other lots of bulletin board material.

Yup. It's a big game for both teams--but particularly the Bears. They lose this one--and undoubtedly it will set into play a chain of events that set the organization in a new direction...

Yup. And I sure hope that happens. The Chicago organization has been solid and stable for many years and I personally think Smith is a good (tho not great) coach. I would love to see all that scuttled and send them back to the drawing board.

_HD_ wrote:

duck wrote:

_HD_ wrote:

duck wrote:

MB20 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Linebacker Brian Urlacher has responded to Packers tight end Jermichael Finley, who said that the Bears are better off with the long-time anchor of their defense.

“Just like a couple of years ago, I think, he tore his ACL and the Packers were actually better without him,” Urlacher told SiriusXM NFL Radio on Thursday, via the Chicago Sun-Times. “You know, they won the Super Bowl. I hope we can duplicate that as well because it won’t hurt my feelings if we go on and win the Super Bowl without me like they did without him.”

Score one for Urlacher.

It's weird how testy this Sunday's game is getting. It's been a while since I've seen this much trash talking before a game. Each team is giving the other lots of bulletin board material.

Yup. It's a big game for both teams--but particularly the Bears. They lose this one--and undoubtedly it will set into play a chain of events that set the organization in a new direction...

Yup. And I sure hope that happens. The Chicago organization has been solid and stable for many years and I personally think Smith is a good (tho not great) coach. I would love to see all that scuttled and send them back to the drawing board.

Actually, I am of the opposite opinion... In my view the Bears are just fine in their mediocrity. A change represents an opportunity for them to bring in those with the capacity to significantly improve their prospects--perhaps even someone with enough of a brain to see that Jay Cuntler is not an NFL franchise QB. Naw---I'd rather continue seeing Lovie's bewildered fucking ass roaming the sidelines with his hands in his pockets cupping his nuts...

MB20 wrote:

_HD_ wrote:

duck wrote:

_HD_ wrote:

duck wrote:

MB20 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Linebacker Brian Urlacher has responded to Packers tight end Jermichael Finley, who said that the Bears are better off with the long-time anchor of their defense.

“Just like a couple of years ago, I think, he tore his ACL and the Packers were actually better without him,” Urlacher told SiriusXM NFL Radio on Thursday, via the Chicago Sun-Times. “You know, they won the Super Bowl. I hope we can duplicate that as well because it won’t hurt my feelings if we go on and win the Super Bowl without me like they did without him.”

Score one for Urlacher.

It's weird how testy this Sunday's game is getting. It's been a while since I've seen this much trash talking before a game. Each team is giving the other lots of bulletin board material.

Yup. It's a big game for both teams--but particularly the Bears. They lose this one--and undoubtedly it will set into play a chain of events that set the organization in a new direction...

Yup. And I sure hope that happens. The Chicago organization has been solid and stable for many years and I personally think Smith is a good (tho not great) coach. I would love to see all that scuttled and send them back to the drawing board.

Actually, I am of the opposite opinion... In my view the Bears are just fine in their mediocrity. A change represents an opportunity for them to bring in those with the capacity to significantly improve their prospects--perhaps even someone with enough of a brain to see that Jay Cuntler is not an NFL franchise QB. Naw---I'd rather continue seeing Lovie's bewildered fucking ass roaming the sidelines with his hands in his pockets cupping his nuts...

Couldn't agree more.

duck wrote:

MB20 wrote:

_HD_ wrote:

duck wrote:

_HD_ wrote:

duck wrote:

MB20 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Linebacker Brian Urlacher has responded to Packers tight end Jermichael Finley, who said that the Bears are better off with the long-time anchor of their defense.

“Just like a couple of years ago, I think, he tore his ACL and the Packers were actually better without him,” Urlacher told SiriusXM NFL Radio on Thursday, via the Chicago Sun-Times. “You know, they won the Super Bowl. I hope we can duplicate that as well because it won’t hurt my feelings if we go on and win the Super Bowl without me like they did without him.”

Score one for Urlacher.

It's weird how testy this Sunday's game is getting. It's been a while since I've seen this much trash talking before a game. Each team is giving the other lots of bulletin board material.

Yup. It's a big game for both teams--but particularly the Bears. They lose this one--and undoubtedly it will set into play a chain of events that set the organization in a new direction...

Yup. And I sure hope that happens. The Chicago organization has been solid and stable for many years and I personally think Smith is a good (tho not great) coach. I would love to see all that scuttled and send them back to the drawing board.

Actually, I am of the opposite opinion... In my view the Bears are just fine in their mediocrity. A change represents an opportunity for them to bring in those with the capacity to significantly improve their prospects--perhaps even someone with enough of a brain to see that Jay Cuntler is not an NFL franchise QB. Naw---I'd rather continue seeing Lovie's bewildered fucking ass roaming the sidelines with his hands in his pockets cupping his nuts...

Couldn't agree more.

Well, what these idiots see in Cutler is beyond me. The guy is a fucking loser. Total choke artist. The bigger the game, the worse he performs. So, on the basis of us losing Cutler as the QB of our rival, I agree with you guys.

However, take that away and Lovie and his program are good, characterized by tough ball-hawking defense and exceptional special teams. In short, they've been a better-than-average team for the last few years.

To draw a card analogy, I see the Bears as a 10. If you were to throw that card away and get a new one at random, sure you could get a jack, queen, king or ace. However, the odds are greater you'd get something from deuce through nine.

I just see the odds of the Bears getting worse with a clean start much greater than I see them getting better.

MB20 wrote:

duck wrote:

MB20 wrote:

_HD_ wrote:

duck wrote:

_HD_ wrote:

duck wrote:

MB20 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Linebacker Brian Urlacher has responded to Packers tight end Jermichael Finley, who said that the Bears are better off with the long-time anchor of their defense.

“Just like a couple of years ago, I think, he tore his ACL and the Packers were actually better without him,” Urlacher told SiriusXM NFL Radio on Thursday, via the Chicago Sun-Times. “You know, they won the Super Bowl. I hope we can duplicate that as well because it won’t hurt my feelings if we go on and win the Super Bowl without me like they did without him.”

Score one for Urlacher.

It's weird how testy this Sunday's game is getting. It's been a while since I've seen this much trash talking before a game. Each team is giving the other lots of bulletin board material.

Yup. It's a big game for both teams--but particularly the Bears. They lose this one--and undoubtedly it will set into play a chain of events that set the organization in a new direction...

Yup. And I sure hope that happens. The Chicago organization has been solid and stable for many years and I personally think Smith is a good (tho not great) coach. I would love to see all that scuttled and send them back to the drawing board.

Actually, I am of the opposite opinion... In my view the Bears are just fine in their mediocrity. A change represents an opportunity for them to bring in those with the capacity to significantly improve their prospects--perhaps even someone with enough of a brain to see that Jay Cuntler is not an NFL franchise QB. Naw---I'd rather continue seeing Lovie's bewildered fucking ass roaming the sidelines with his hands in his pockets cupping his nuts...

Couldn't agree more.

Well, what these idiots see in Cutler is beyond me. The guy is a fucking loser. Total choke artist. The bigger the game, the worse he performs. So, on the basis of us losing Cutler as the QB of our rival, I agree with you guys.

However, take that away and Lovie and his program are good, characterized by tough ball-hawking defense and exceptional special teams. In short, they've been a better-than-average team for the last few years.

To draw a card analogy, I see the Bears as a 10. If you were to throw that card away and get a new one at random, sure you could get a jack, queen, king or ace. However, the odds are greater you'd get something from deuce through nine.

I just see the odds of the Bears getting worse with a clean start much greater than I see them getting better.

I'd rather the Packers strive to continue to be a face card/ace and let the Bears be a 10.

I work with a Bears fan, and I always tell him that Cutler is the absolute worst kind of QB to have. He'll be good enough to make you above average. He'll get you into the playoffs if you give him a good enough defense. He'll never, ever win you a Super Bowl because he's a punk loser at his core. But he'll show you enough that if your decision makers are muddy-headed, delusional dopes, he can stick around for years.