Just another steeler lying

Dmounts wrote:Steelers receiver [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] said that he and Browns punter [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] talked after Sunday’s game, which featured Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] during a return.  Brown said that he and Lanning [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and that everything is fine.
It’s a great story.  It would be even better if it were true, apparently.
According to Zac Jackson of FOX Sports Ohio, Lanning says that he didn’t talk to Brown after the game, and that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
“[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.],” Lanning said.
Wonder when or even if Brown gets fined.

Dmounts wrote:Steelers receiver [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] said that he and Browns punter [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] talked after Sunday’s game, which featured Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] during a return.  Brown said that he and Lanning [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and that everything is fine.
It’s a great story.  It would be even better if it were true, apparently.
According to Zac Jackson of FOX Sports Ohio, Lanning says that he didn’t talk to Brown after the game, and that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
“[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.],” Lanning said.
Wonder when or even if Brown gets fined.

Dmounts wrote:Steelers receiver [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] said that he and Browns punter [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] talked after Sunday’s game, which featured Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] during a return.  Brown said that he and Lanning [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and that everything is fine.
It’s a great story.  It would be even better if it were true, apparently.
According to Zac Jackson of FOX Sports Ohio, Lanning says that he didn’t talk to Brown after the game, and that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
“[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.],” Lanning said.
Wonder when or even if Brown gets fined.

Steely wrote:

Dmounts wrote:Steelers receiver [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] said that he and Browns punter [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] talked after Sunday’s game, which featured Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] during a return.  Brown said that he and Lanning [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and that everything is fine.
It’s a great story.  It would be even better if it were true, apparently.
According to Zac Jackson of FOX Sports Ohio, Lanning says that he didn’t talk to Brown after the game, and that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
“[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.],” Lanning said.
Wonder when or even if Brown gets fined.

Of course, our resident mental midgets, Forrest and Wyckedheart, automatically assume that Antonio Brown is lying. It's a case of "he said, he said."  It's Lanning's word against Brown's word. Where's your proof that Brown is lying???

Randell60 wrote:

Steely wrote:

Dmounts wrote:Steelers receiver [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] said that he and Browns punter [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] talked after Sunday’s game, which featured Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] during a return.  Brown said that he and Lanning [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and that everything is fine.
It’s a great story.  It would be even better if it were true, apparently.
According to Zac Jackson of FOX Sports Ohio, Lanning says that he didn’t talk to Brown after the game, and that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
“[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.],” Lanning said.
Wonder when or even if Brown gets fined.

Of course, our resident mental midgets, Forrest and Wyckedheart, automatically assume that Antonio Brown is lying. It's a case of "he said, he said."  It's Lanning's word against Brown's word. Where's your proof that Brown is lying???

Here ya' go: According to Zac Jackson of FOX Sports Ohio, Lanning says that he didn’t talk to Brown after the game, and that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
“[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.],” Lanning said.
Wonder when or even if Brown gets fined.

Steely wrote:

Randell60 wrote:

Steely wrote:

Dmounts wrote:Steelers receiver [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] said that he and Browns punter [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] talked after Sunday’s game, which featured Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] during a return.  Brown said that he and Lanning [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and that everything is fine.
It’s a great story.  It would be even better if it were true, apparently.
According to Zac Jackson of FOX Sports Ohio, Lanning says that he didn’t talk to Brown after the game, and that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
“[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.],” Lanning said.
Wonder when or even if Brown gets fined.

Of course, our resident mental midgets, Forrest and Wyckedheart, automatically assume that Antonio Brown is lying. It's a case of "he said, he said."  It's Lanning's word against Brown's word. Where's your proof that Brown is lying???

Here ya' go: According to Zac Jackson of FOX Sports Ohio, Lanning says that he didn’t talk to Brown after the game, and that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
“[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.],” Lanning said.
Wonder when or even if Brown gets fined.

For the 2nd time, Randell, it's Lanning's word against Brown's word. It's a case of "he said/he said." There is ZERO proof that Lanning is telling the truth and Brown is lying.

guppy wrote:No matter who you believe, its still a Play Of The Week worth revisiting.   Kinda like the Butt Fumble is in my neck of the woods.

"Finish him!"

Randell60 wrote:

guppy wrote:No matter who you believe, its still a Play Of The Week worth revisiting.   Kinda like the Butt Fumble is in my neck of the woods.

"Finish him!"

You have to wonder, in today's NFL. If Brown wasn't picturing his wife/girlfriend/child trying to tackle him and lost it?  LOL

Then he would have to go on Goodell's Double Secret Probation Exempt List.  LOL. 

Is there a maximum, because spaces are filling up fast?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Steely wrote:

Dmounts wrote:Steelers receiver [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] said that he and Browns punter [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] talked after Sunday’s game, which featured Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] during a return.  Brown said that he and Lanning [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and that everything is fine.
It’s a great story.  It would be even better if it were true, apparently.
According to Zac Jackson of FOX Sports Ohio, Lanning says that he didn’t talk to Brown after the game, and that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
“[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.],” Lanning said.
Wonder when or even if Brown gets fined.

Of course, our resident mental midgets, Forrest and Wyckedheart, automatically assume that Antonio Brown is lying. It's a case of "he said, he said."  It's Lanning's word against Brown's word. Where's your proof that Brown is lying???

Dmounts wrote:

Steely wrote:

Dmounts wrote:Steelers receiver [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] said that he and Browns punter [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] talked after Sunday’s game, which featured Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] during a return.  Brown said that he and Lanning [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and that everything is fine.
It’s a great story.  It would be even better if it were true, apparently.
According to Zac Jackson of FOX Sports Ohio, Lanning says that he didn’t talk to Brown after the game, and that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
“[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.],” Lanning said.
Wonder when or even if Brown gets fined.

Of course, our resident mental midgets, Forrest and Wyckedheart, automatically assume that Antonio Brown is lying. It's a case of "he said, he said."  It's Lanning's word against Brown's word. Where's your proof that Brown is lying???

Once again GUMP eats CROW.

Four weeks and three days ago, Steelers receiver[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] tried to get past Browns punter[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] by putting a foot in the punter’s face.  As the Steelers and Browns prepare for the second game of their annual series, Brown doesn’t have much to say about his heat-of-the-moment decision to kick Lanning in the head.
Asked about Lanning’s claim that Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] about the incident after the game, Brown said, “That was a couple of games ago.  If I get the opportunity this week, I’ll definitely reach out to him.”
So is that an admission Brown wasn’t being accurate when he said he spoke to Lanning?
“I don’t recall,” Brown said.  “It was about five weeks ago.”
He acts like it was five years ago.  While plenty has happened in the NFL since then, Brown either did or didn’t talk to Lanning after the game.  Four weeks ago, Brown said he “[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]” spoke to Lanning.  Lanning says Brown didn’t.  For Brown to now say he doesn’t remember, that’s likely a roundabout way of admitting it never happened.

Dmounts wrote:

Steely wrote:

Dmounts wrote:Steelers receiver [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] said that he and Browns punter [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] talked after Sunday’s game, which featured Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] during a return.  Brown said that he and Lanning [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and that everything is fine.
It’s a great story.  It would be even better if it were true, apparently.
According to Zac Jackson of FOX Sports Ohio, Lanning says that he didn’t talk to Brown after the game, and that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
“[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.],” Lanning said.
Wonder when or even if Brown gets fined.

Of course, our resident mental midgets, Forrest and Wyckedheart, automatically assume that Antonio Brown is lying. It's a case of "he said, he said."  It's Lanning's word against Brown's word. Where's your proof that Brown is lying???

Once again GUMP eats CROW.

Four weeks and three days ago, Steelers receiver[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] tried to get past Browns punter[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] by putting a foot in the punter’s face.  As the Steelers and Browns prepare for the second game of their annual series, Brown doesn’t have much to say about his heat-of-the-moment decision to kick Lanning in the head.
Asked about Lanning’s claim that Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] about the incident after the game, Brown said, “That was a couple of games ago.  If I get the opportunity this week, I’ll definitely reach out to him.”
So is that an admission Brown wasn’t being accurate when he said he spoke to Lanning?
“I don’t recall,” Brown said.  “It was about five weeks ago.”
He acts like it was five years ago.  While plenty has happened in the NFL since then, Brown either did or didn’t talk to Lanning after the game.  Four weeks ago, Brown said he “[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]” spoke to Lanning.  Lanning says Brown didn’t.  For Brown to now say he doesn’t remember, that’s likely a roundabout way of admitting it never happened.

Admin wrote:

Dmounts wrote:

Steely wrote:

Dmounts wrote:Steelers receiver [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] said that he and Browns punter [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] talked after Sunday’s game, which featured Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] during a return.  Brown said that he and Lanning [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and that everything is fine.
It’s a great story.  It would be even better if it were true, apparently.
According to Zac Jackson of FOX Sports Ohio, Lanning says that he didn’t talk to Brown after the game, and that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
“[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.],” Lanning said.
Wonder when or even if Brown gets fined.

Of course, our resident mental midgets, Forrest and Wyckedheart, automatically assume that Antonio Brown is lying. It's a case of "he said, he said."  It's Lanning's word against Brown's word. Where's your proof that Brown is lying???

Once again GUMP eats CROW.

Four weeks and three days ago, Steelers receiver[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] tried to get past Browns punter[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] by putting a foot in the punter’s face.  As the Steelers and Browns prepare for the second game of their annual series, Brown doesn’t have much to say about his heat-of-the-moment decision to kick Lanning in the head.
Asked about Lanning’s claim that Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] about the incident after the game, Brown said, “That was a couple of games ago.  If I get the opportunity this week, I’ll definitely reach out to him.”
So is that an admission Brown wasn’t being accurate when he said he spoke to Lanning?
“I don’t recall,” Brown said.  “It was about five weeks ago.”
He acts like it was five years ago.  While plenty has happened in the NFL since then, Brown either did or didn’t talk to Lanning after the game.  Four weeks ago, Brown said he “[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]” spoke to Lanning.  Lanning says Brown didn’t.  For Brown to now say he doesn’t remember, that’s likely a roundabout way of admitting it never happened.

 Other than a few Browns fans.... who the fuck cares? Myself... I'm looking forward to a great football game. One in which I fear MY team is gonna have it's hands full. They may get beat by a vastly improved Browns team. It has been a good while since this has been possible. Good luck to you Brownies.... The whole kick in the face, he said- no he didn't is a story for the women to talk about.... meanwhile the men are ready for battle.

Steely wrote:

Dmounts wrote:

Steely wrote:

Dmounts wrote:Steelers receiver [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] said that he and Browns punter [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] talked after Sunday’s game, which featured Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] during a return.  Brown said that he and Lanning [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and that everything is fine.
It’s a great story.  It would be even better if it were true, apparently.
According to Zac Jackson of FOX Sports Ohio, Lanning says that he didn’t talk to Brown after the game, and that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
“[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.],” Lanning said.
Wonder when or even if Brown gets fined.

Of course, our resident mental midgets, Forrest and Wyckedheart, automatically assume that Antonio Brown is lying. It's a case of "he said, he said."  It's Lanning's word against Brown's word. Where's your proof that Brown is lying???

Once again GUMP eats CROW.

Four weeks and three days ago, Steelers receiver[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] tried to get past Browns punter[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] by putting a foot in the punter’s face.  As the Steelers and Browns prepare for the second game of their annual series, Brown doesn’t have much to say about his heat-of-the-moment decision to kick Lanning in the head.
Asked about Lanning’s claim that Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] about the incident after the game, Brown said, “That was a couple of games ago.  If I get the opportunity this week, I’ll definitely reach out to him.”
So is that an admission Brown wasn’t being accurate when he said he spoke to Lanning?
“I don’t recall,” Brown said.  “It was about five weeks ago.”
He acts like it was five years ago.  While plenty has happened in the NFL since then, Brown either did or didn’t talk to Lanning after the game.  Four weeks ago, Brown said he “[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]” spoke to Lanning.  Lanning says Brown didn’t.  For Brown to now say he doesn’t remember, that’s likely a roundabout way of admitting it never happened.

Forrest, you're dumber than I originally thought you were. When the incident first happened, Brown said he talked to him, Lanning said he didn't. That's a classic case of he said/he said.. No proof whatsoever as to who was lying, but you took it upon yourself to automatically accuse Brown of lying because he's the Steeler. You can't do that with ZERO proof, just because you hate the Steelers. Duh! If Brown came out this week and admitted he lied, then he's the liar. That easy! Therefore, I eat no crow and you're almost as dumb as Wyckedheart, which is why I started calling you "Forrest" to begin with. To no surprise, you weakly retaliate by calling me "Gump." LOL! So original!

Dmounts wrote:

Steely wrote:

Dmounts wrote:

Steely wrote:

Dmounts wrote:Steelers receiver [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] said that he and Browns punter [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] talked after Sunday’s game, which featured Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] during a return.  Brown said that he and Lanning [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and that everything is fine.
It’s a great story.  It would be even better if it were true, apparently.
According to Zac Jackson of FOX Sports Ohio, Lanning says that he didn’t talk to Brown after the game, and that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
“[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.],” Lanning said.
Wonder when or even if Brown gets fined.

Of course, our resident mental midgets, Forrest and Wyckedheart, automatically assume that Antonio Brown is lying. It's a case of "he said, he said."  It's Lanning's word against Brown's word. Where's your proof that Brown is lying???

Once again GUMP eats CROW.

Four weeks and three days ago, Steelers receiver[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] tried to get past Browns punter[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] by putting a foot in the punter’s face.  As the Steelers and Browns prepare for the second game of their annual series, Brown doesn’t have much to say about his heat-of-the-moment decision to kick Lanning in the head.
Asked about Lanning’s claim that Brown [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] about the incident after the game, Brown said, “That was a couple of games ago.  If I get the opportunity this week, I’ll definitely reach out to him.”
So is that an admission Brown wasn’t being accurate when he said he spoke to Lanning?
“I don’t recall,” Brown said.  “It was about five weeks ago.”
He acts like it was five years ago.  While plenty has happened in the NFL since then, Brown either did or didn’t talk to Lanning after the game.  Four weeks ago, Brown said he “[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]” spoke to Lanning.  Lanning says Brown didn’t.  For Brown to now say he doesn’t remember, that’s likely a roundabout way of admitting it never happened.

Forrest, you're dumber than I originally thought you were. When the incident first happened, Brown said he talked to him, Lanning said he didn't. That's a classic case of he said/he said.. No proof whatsoever as to who was lying, but you took it upon yourself to automatically accuse Brown of lying because he's the Steeler. You can't do that with ZERO proof, just because you hate the Steelers. Duh! If Brown came out this week and admitted he lied, then he's the liar. That easy! Therefore, I eat no crow and you're almost as dumb as Wyckedheart, which is why I started calling you "Forrest" to begin with. To no surprise, you weakly retaliate by calling me "Gump." LOL! So original!

 LOL @ Squeely Gump yell right  Like I posted he lied and now there's proof. Deal with it. 

Dmounts wrote:Like I said deal with Gump. Your guy lied and the proof is now in the open. Sorry to bust your bubble.

Dmounts wrote:I can see you are having a hard time dealing with it. The trueth hurts sometimes.

Randell60 wrote:You guys should just duke it out during recess....

Dmounts wrote:

Randell60 wrote:You guys should just duke it out during recess....

He is my puppet. I pull his string and he talks.

Dmounts wrote:LMAO @ fog nutin??? LOL