What I think if Woodley returns for Thursday

leejr wrote: If Woodley returns for Thursday's game, they should start Worlids on the left (his natural position where he has been VERY effective) and split the playing time on the right side between Woodley and J. Jones. This gives Woodley a rest, keeps him fresh and puts Jones into the game on plays where he will be most effective.
The bigger problem is the loss of McLendon. However, Al Woods did a decent job filling in at NT against Cleveland and recorded the first two sacks of his career. I think they should give Woods a shot and use Hood at NT in certain situations if needed

diehardsteersfan wrote:

leejr wrote: If Woodley returns for Thursday's game, they should start Worlids on the left (his natural position where he has been VERY effective) and split the playing time on the right side between Woodley and J. Jones. This gives Woodley a rest, keeps him fresh and puts Jones into the game on plays where he will be most effective.
The bigger problem is the loss of McLendon. However, Al Woods did a decent job filling in at NT against Cleveland and recorded the first two sacks of his career. I think they should give Woods a shot and use Hood at NT in certain situations if needed

I believe that Woods had 2 sacks in the Cleveland game.  Let me just say that when Woods went into the game against Cleveland, our defense seemed like that they were getting alot more pressure.

Cleveland has NO running game. Being one dimensional, it is easy to pin their ears back and pressure on 98% passes. Notice they haven't looked so stellar against teams with a running threat or two?

Randell60 wrote:

diehardsteersfan wrote:

leejr wrote: If Woodley returns for Thursday's game, they should start Worlids on the left (his natural position where he has been VERY effective) and split the playing time on the right side between Woodley and J. Jones. This gives Woodley a rest, keeps him fresh and puts Jones into the game on plays where he will be most effective.
The bigger problem is the loss of McLendon. However, Al Woods did a decent job filling in at NT against Cleveland and recorded the first two sacks of his career. I think they should give Woods a shot and use Hood at NT in certain situations if needed

I believe that Woods had 2 sacks in the Cleveland game.  Let me just say that when Woods went into the game against Cleveland, our defense seemed like that they were getting alot more pressure.

Cleveland has NO running game. Being one dimensional, it is easy to pin their ears back and pressure on 98% passes. Notice they haven't looked so stellar against teams with a running threat or two?

diehardsteersfan wrote:

Randell60 wrote:

diehardsteersfan wrote:

leejr wrote: If Woodley returns for Thursday's game, they should start Worlids on the left (his natural position where he has been VERY effective) and split the playing time on the right side between Woodley and J. Jones. This gives Woodley a rest, keeps him fresh and puts Jones into the game on plays where he will be most effective.
The bigger problem is the loss of McLendon. However, Al Woods did a decent job filling in at NT against Cleveland and recorded the first two sacks of his career. I think they should give Woods a shot and use Hood at NT in certain situations if needed

I believe that Woods had 2 sacks in the Cleveland game.  Let me just say that when Woods went into the game against Cleveland, our defense seemed like that they were getting alot more pressure.

Cleveland has NO running game. Being one dimensional, it is easy to pin their ears back and pressure on 98% passes. Notice they haven't looked so stellar against teams with a running threat or two?

Do you watch our games? 

I gave up watching them after they lost the first four. Watching two Browns like teams was to much for my heart....LOL

Randell60 wrote:

diehardsteersfan wrote:

Randell60 wrote:

diehardsteersfan wrote:

leejr wrote: If Woodley returns for Thursday's game, they should start Worlids on the left (his natural position where he has been VERY effective) and split the playing time on the right side between Woodley and J. Jones. This gives Woodley a rest, keeps him fresh and puts Jones into the game on plays where he will be most effective.
The bigger problem is the loss of McLendon. However, Al Woods did a decent job filling in at NT against Cleveland and recorded the first two sacks of his career. I think they should give Woods a shot and use Hood at NT in certain situations if needed

I believe that Woods had 2 sacks in the Cleveland game.  Let me just say that when Woods went into the game against Cleveland, our defense seemed like that they were getting alot more pressure.

Cleveland has NO running game. Being one dimensional, it is easy to pin their ears back and pressure on 98% passes. Notice they haven't looked so stellar against teams with a running threat or two?

Do you watch our games? 

I gave up watching them after they lost the first four. Watching two Browns like teams was to much for my heart....LOL

diehardsteersfan wrote:

Randell60 wrote:

diehardsteersfan wrote:

Randell60 wrote:

diehardsteersfan wrote:

leejr wrote: If Woodley returns for Thursday's game, they should start Worlids on the left (his natural position where he has been VERY effective) and split the playing time on the right side between Woodley and J. Jones. This gives Woodley a rest, keeps him fresh and puts Jones into the game on plays where he will be most effective.
The bigger problem is the loss of McLendon. However, Al Woods did a decent job filling in at NT against Cleveland and recorded the first two sacks of his career. I think they should give Woods a shot and use Hood at NT in certain situations if needed

I believe that Woods had 2 sacks in the Cleveland game.  Let me just say that when Woods went into the game against Cleveland, our defense seemed like that they were getting alot more pressure.

Cleveland has NO running game. Being one dimensional, it is easy to pin their ears back and pressure on 98% passes. Notice they haven't looked so stellar against teams with a running threat or two?

Do you watch our games? 

I gave up watching them after they lost the first four. Watching two Browns like teams was to much for my heart....LOL

LOL!  You seem to have a handle on our team...that's pretty amazing coming from a fan of another team.    I bet you're a secret closet Steelers fan.  LOL!

BUSTED!!!  I wear my K-Mart plastic Steeler gear around the house, with the drapes shut. If someone stops by, I remove it, sling it in the hamper, and the Brown's crap I have on underneath represents..... 

Randell60 wrote:

diehardsteersfan wrote:

Randell60 wrote:

diehardsteersfan wrote:

Randell60 wrote:

diehardsteersfan wrote:

leejr wrote: If Woodley returns for Thursday's game, they should start Worlids on the left (his natural position where he has been VERY effective) and split the playing time on the right side between Woodley and J. Jones. This gives Woodley a rest, keeps him fresh and puts Jones into the game on plays where he will be most effective.
The bigger problem is the loss of McLendon. However, Al Woods did a decent job filling in at NT against Cleveland and recorded the first two sacks of his career. I think they should give Woods a shot and use Hood at NT in certain situations if needed

I believe that Woods had 2 sacks in the Cleveland game.  Let me just say that when Woods went into the game against Cleveland, our defense seemed like that they were getting alot more pressure.

Cleveland has NO running game. Being one dimensional, it is easy to pin their ears back and pressure on 98% passes. Notice they haven't looked so stellar against teams with a running threat or two?

Do you watch our games? 

I gave up watching them after they lost the first four. Watching two Browns like teams was to much for my heart....LOL

LOL!  You seem to have a handle on our team...that's pretty amazing coming from a fan of another team.    I bet you're a secret closet Steelers fan.  LOL!

BUSTED!!!  I wear my K-Mart plastic Steeler gear around the house, with the drapes shut. If someone stops by, I remove it, sling it in the hamper, and the Brown's crap I have on underneath represents.....