Week Two--Bears@Pack

by Guest Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:16 pm

HD 27-23 Pack 1-0

by milani Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:07 pm

HD 27-23 Pack 1-0
Milani 27-21 Bears 1-0

by MB20 Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:14 pm

HD 27-23 Pack 1-0
Milani 27-21 Bears 1-0
MB 28-24 Pack 0-1

by duck Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:16 am

HD 27-23 Pack 1-0
Milani 27-21 Bears 1-0
MB 28-24 Pack 0-1
Duck 34-24 Pack 0-1

by JnC4GB Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:12 pm

HD 27-23 Pack 1-0
Milani 27-21 Bears 1-0
MB 28-24 Pack 0-1
Duck 34-24 Pack 0-1
JnC 31-27 Pack 1-0

by JnC4GB Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:15 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by KBen Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:26 pm

HD 27-23 Pack 1-0
Milani 27-21 Bears 1-0
MB 28-24 Pack 0-1
Duck 34-24 Pack 0-1
JnC 31-27 Pack 1-0
KBen 23-20 Pack 0-1

by MB20 Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:46 pm

I'm embarrassed to have it on the record that I thought Cutler could hang 24 on us... fucking clown Smile

This game was balm for the soul

by Guest Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:50 am

HD 27-23 Pack 2-0
Milani 27-21 Bears 1-1
MB 28-24 Pack 1-1
Duck 34-24 Pack 1-1
JnC 31-27 Pack 2-0
KBen 23-20 Pack 1-1

A fine job indeed... AJ Hawk and the Claymaker get the game balls for the week...and Ben gets a gift certificate to enjoy his very own preferred version of game balls in his most mouth-watering entree at his favorite restaurant... Bon appetite! Cool

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by duck Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:46 am

HD 27-23 Pack 2-0
Milani 27-21 Bears 1-1
MB 28-24 Pack 1-1
Duck 34-24 Pack 1-1
JnC 31-27 Pack 2-0
KBen 23-20 Pack 1-1

Hey... KBen hit the Packers' score right but I was the closest in point differential!

We need to establish some criteria here.

by Guest Fri Sep 14, 2012 11:57 am

duck wrote:HD 27-23 Pack 2-0
Milani 27-21 Bears 1-1
MB 28-24 Pack 1-1
Duck 34-24 Pack 1-1
JnC 31-27 Pack 2-0
KBen 23-20 Pack 1-1

Hey... KBen hit the Packers' score right but I was the closest in point differential!

We need to establish some criteria here.

LOL! Point differential? So--you're saying Duck that since the final score was 23-10...and Ben NAILED the Packer's score while also being the closest in collective points off from the final score (10)--that somebody with merely the closest point differential--no matter how far off from the final score they are--should prevail?! So, in another words--since the point differential was 13--had someone picked the final score to be 70-57...they should have won? Laughing

I know acid is making a comeback, man--but you're too old for that shit, dude... LOL

by duck Fri Sep 14, 2012 12:06 pm

_HD_ wrote:
duck wrote:HD 27-23 Pack 2-0
Milani 27-21 Bears 1-1
MB 28-24 Pack 1-1
Duck 34-24 Pack 1-1
JnC 31-27 Pack 2-0
KBen 23-20 Pack 1-1

Hey... KBen hit the Packers' score right but I was the closest in point differential!

We need to establish some criteria here.

LOL! Point differential? So--you're saying Duck that since the final score was 23-10...and Ben NAILED the Packer's score while also being the closest in collective points off from the final score (10)--that somebody with merely the closest point differential--no matter how far off from the final score they are--should prevail?! So, in another words--since the point differential was 13--had someone picked the final score to be 70-57...they should have won? I know acid is making a comeback, man--but you're too old for that shit, dude... LOL

Suppose someone nailed the Packer score with a 23-0 prediction? Or a 23-22 prediction? And the other scores were 27-15, 20-7, 24-10, and 28-13?

Like I said, we need some criteria.

by Guest Fri Sep 14, 2012 12:25 pm

duck wrote:
_HD_ wrote:
duck wrote:HD 27-23 Pack 2-0
Milani 27-21 Bears 1-1
MB 28-24 Pack 1-1
Duck 34-24 Pack 1-1
JnC 31-27 Pack 2-0
KBen 23-20 Pack 1-1

Hey... KBen hit the Packers' score right but I was the closest in point differential!

We need to establish some criteria here.

LOL! Point differential? So--you're saying Duck that since the final score was 23-10...and Ben NAILED the Packer's score while also being the closest in collective points off from the final score (10)--that somebody with merely the closest point differential--no matter how far off from the final score they are--should prevail?! So, in another words--since the point differential was 13--had someone picked the final score to be 70-57...they should have won? I know acid is making a comeback, man--but you're too old for that shit, dude... LOL

Suppose someone nailed the Packer score with a 23-0 prediction? Or a 23-22 prediction? And the other scores were 27-15, 20-7, 24-10, and 28-13?

Like I said, we need some criteria.

It's a very complicated proprietary formula, Duck... It's basically the lowest collective point total off from the final score. Beyond that would require an afternoon of charts, graphs, whiteboards, bimbo body shots and PDF files to explain... Tell Sabrina at the front desk that you'd like the form to submit a formal complaint--and a best effort will be made to get a decision back to you by your 70th birthday... Laughing

by milani Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:36 pm

Did anyone notice that Ringo did not post a score? Wonder if he is still in mourning from last Sunday's lost. I mean.. this is the poster that had a 15-1 record last year and beat all of us during the season.

Or did he have too much Effen and thought the game was being played on Sunday?

by KBen Fri Sep 14, 2012 7:21 pm

_HD_ wrote:
duck wrote:
_HD_ wrote:
duck wrote:HD 27-23 Pack 2-0
Milani 27-21 Bears 1-1
MB 28-24 Pack 1-1
Duck 34-24 Pack 1-1
JnC 31-27 Pack 2-0
KBen 23-20 Pack 1-1

Hey... KBen hit the Packers' score right but I was the closest in point differential!

We need to establish some criteria here.

LOL! Point differential? So--you're saying Duck that since the final score was 23-10...and Ben NAILED the Packer's score while also being the closest in collective points off from the final score (10)--that somebody with merely the closest point differential--no matter how far off from the final score they are--should prevail?! So, in another words--since the point differential was 13--had someone picked the final score to be 70-57...they should have won? I know acid is making a comeback, man--but you're too old for that shit, dude... LOL

Suppose someone nailed the Packer score with a 23-0 prediction? Or a 23-22 prediction? And the other scores were 27-15, 20-7, 24-10, and 28-13?

Like I said, we need some criteria.

It's a very complicated proprietary formula, Duck... It's basically the lowest collective point total off from the final score. Beyond that would require an afternoon of charts, graphs, whiteboards, bimbo body shots and PDF files to explain... Tell Sabrina at the front desk that you'd like the form to submit a formal complaint--and a best effort will be made to get a decision back to you by your 70th birthday...

Let it ride Quackman....after all, HD's prize packages blow....I mean come fuckin on man, a free bowl of chicken scrotum soup ? Yeesh....May as well offer up Thor's services for a complimentary taint shaving and spit shine while you are at it Wink

by Guest Fri Sep 14, 2012 7:54 pm

KBen wrote:
_HD_ wrote:
duck wrote:
_HD_ wrote:
duck wrote:HD 27-23 Pack 2-0
Milani 27-21 Bears 1-1
MB 28-24 Pack 1-1
Duck 34-24 Pack 1-1
JnC 31-27 Pack 2-0
KBen 23-20 Pack 1-1

Hey... KBen hit the Packers' score right but I was the closest in point differential!

We need to establish some criteria here.

LOL! Point differential? So--you're saying Duck that since the final score was 23-10...and Ben NAILED the Packer's score while also being the closest in collective points off from the final score (10)--that somebody with merely the closest point differential--no matter how far off from the final score they are--should prevail?! So, in another words--since the point differential was 13--had someone picked the final score to be 70-57...they should have won? I know acid is making a comeback, man--but you're too old for that shit, dude... LOL

Suppose someone nailed the Packer score with a 23-0 prediction? Or a 23-22 prediction? And the other scores were 27-15, 20-7, 24-10, and 28-13?

Like I said, we need some criteria.

It's a very complicated proprietary formula, Duck... It's basically the lowest collective point total off from the final score. Beyond that would require an afternoon of charts, graphs, whiteboards, bimbo body shots and PDF files to explain... Tell Sabrina at the front desk that you'd like the form to submit a formal complaint--and a best effort will be made to get a decision back to you by your 70th birthday...

Let it ride Quackman....after all, HD's prize packages blow....I mean come fuckin on man, a free bowl of chicken scrotum soup ? Yeesh....May as well offer up Thor's services for a complimentary taint shaving and spit shine while you are at it

Listen, God damn it! Somewhere there's a chicken out there missing his testicles and the only thing that keeps it's pecker pecking in the pile is the consolation that you might have enjoyed his FUCKING SCROTUM SOUP, BITCH!!! Now show a little respect for the sacrifice to nourish your unappreciative ass!!

by duck Fri Sep 14, 2012 11:45 pm

KBen: Let it ride Quackman....after all, HD's prize packages blow....I mean come fuckin on man, a free bowl of chicken scrotum soup ? Yeesh....May as well offer up Thor's services for a complimentary taint shaving and spit shine while you are at it.

Excellent points, KBen.

You win.

by JnC4GB Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:20 am

I don't always have scrotum soup, but when I do, I have it have it with spit-shined taint.

by duck Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:37 am

JnC4GB wrote:I don't always have scrotum soup, but when I do, I have it have it with spit-shined taint.

Aw, I can just picture Mrs. JnC packing your lunchbox...

by ILvLamp Sat Sep 15, 2012 7:27 pm

duck wrote:
JnC4GB wrote:I don't always have scrotum soup, but when I do, I have it have it with spit-shined taint.

Aw, I can just picture Mrs. JnC packing your lunchbox...

It looks like it makes her horny when he asks for the extra scoop of spit-shined testicles:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by Sponsored content

Week Two--Bears@Pack

Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

And the winner is...

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack

Re: Week Two--Bears@Pack